By Dr. Ross Turchaninov

This article is a follow-up to the articles about the Placebo Effect published in issues #1 (https://www.scienceofmassage.com/2018/05/the-placebo-effect-and-its-role-in-massage-therapy-part-i/) and #2 (https://www.scienceofmassage.com/2018/08/the-placebo-effect-and-its-role-in-massage-therapy-part-ii/) of JMS. Originally, we thought to publish this article as one piece, but it grew in size, and to make it reader-friendly, we decided to split it into two parts as well. 

The goal of this and Part II of this article is to discuss how the patient’s brain reacts to chronic pain, what mechanisms it uses to protect itself from stress and exhaustion, how to recognize these mechanisms, and how to turn the tables around to overcome psychological obstacles that greatly affect treatment outcomes. 

 

Every patient with chronic pain must deal with its constant bombardment by chronic noxious stimuli while continuing to function and control vital body functions. To protect itself, the patient’s brain may use one or two available protective psychological reactions. Six of them, very frequently, may be observed in patients with chronic somatic pain: anger, regression, hypochondria, fear, denial, projection, rationalization, and emotional insability.

The brain of each patient with chronic pain, to different degrees, employs these protective mechanisms to ease the level of stress developed secondarily. We will discuss these protective mechanisms using the examples of patients from our clinic. To combat these psychological protective reactions, the therapists should alter THEIR behavior to help the brain recover while working locally in the soft tissues. Sometimes, even the wrong tone of voice or incorrect interactions may reinforce an already established wrong behavioral pattern, reinforcing existing chronic somatic or visceral abnormality. Thus, the initially tangled relations between therapist and patient, as visually presented in the picture below, must be untangled while therapy moves forward.

After two previous articles were published, we monitored different discussion boards and noticed a very strange phenomenon: some therapists disregard the psychological component of their work on purpose. Their position is very simple: “I have a patient in my therapy room with lower back pain, and it is my job to help him or her. The rest is not my business and even out of the scope of my practice.” 

Such an unfortunate position is a grave mistake. We in SOMI strongly believe that therapists are making a professional mistake by trying to treat only somatic abnormalities, completely disregarding the psychological component of the chronic pain. Neither a psychologist nor a psychiatrist is present in the therapy room and can assist the patients and the therapist. In such a case, the therapist’s direct responsibility is to consider the psychological component of the somatic pain he or she addresses. Thus, to achieve stable clinical results and treat the patient’s whole body instead of one pain syndrome, therapists must understand how the brain can deal with chronic pain. 

It doesn’t matter if you’re a massage therapist, physical therapist, chiropractor, dentist, or physician. We all MUST consider the psychological component of our therapies, since if we don’t engage the patient’s brain correctly and don’t involve it in the treatment process, wrong established patterns of behavior ruin the treatment process. Also, it would be a great mistake to see all patients with protective reactions as ‘crazy’. Each of us can be in their place if we suffer from chronic pain long enough, with no light at the end of the tunnel. Of course, this ‘long enough’ differs from patient to patient.

Another factor readers should consider is what happened with the patient after the therapist finished and helped him or her with lower back pain. In many cases, the psychosomatic component, which wasn’t addressed during the therapy, may bring the same symptoms back despite the fact that the initial therapy was successful. The patient will always look for other treatment options in these cases, even though the therapist did everything correctly. Still, he or she didn’t address the psychological component of the chronic pain the patient developed.

When I was talking about the psychological component, I didn’t mean psychological therapy, but rather, individually adopting the therapist’s behavior to each patient while conducting necessary treatment. Thus, starting with the first meeting, the therapist must clearly understand the major patterns of the behavior exhibited by every patient with chronic pain and establish communication lines without enforcing existing protective reactions the brain has already developed.

Let us illustrate how patients with different protective reactions behave and what to do about them. To better illustrate the concept, we took the most expressive cases from our clinic. These cases are illustrations, and despite that, they fit into the discussed behavioral profiles. The solution we suggest for each case is based on our personal experience in dealing with patients’ protective reactions.

 

1. ANGER

A 65-year-old retired man came to our clinic with a clinical picture of a frozen shoulder, which he had developed during the previous four months. The evaluation confirmed the presence of a very advanced Adhesive Capsulitis with severe restriction of active and, more importantly, passive movements in the shoulder joint (20% of passive abduction and 10% of active abduction). The severe restriction of passive movements indicated non-compliant contracture, which is extremely difficult to treat, especially in the shoulder joint.

The patient was very angry, upset, and couldn’t stop talking about how much time and money he spent while going through different therapies, while his symptoms steadily worsened. The final solution which was offered to him was active manipulations of his shoulder by an orthopedist while he was under anesthesia and if that failed a shoulder replacement should be considered.

Without discussing his symptoms, it was obvious that Medical Massage would probably solve his problems, but it would require time and repetition. However, the anger the patient exhibited was a major obstacle since he would see our intervention as another way someone tries to make money on his shoulder problems without any results.

The patient has a legitimate right to be angry because of how long and how unsuccessful his therapies were. However, his anger had some pathological bitterness. In small details, he described what his PT, DC, and MT did, accompanied by almost degrading comments about the people who worked on him. It wasn’t just general anger he exhibited, but also anger as a protective reaction developed secondarily to his long suffering.

 

Addressing The Psychological Component Of Somatic Pain Syndrome:

His anger must be channeled into something positive and productive. There were two directions in which we needed to channel his anger: dedication to therapy and intensive homework between sessions to maintain pressure on the system and restore functions. 

First, we needed to get through his defenses. Saying that everyone tried to help him as best as possible wouldn’t fly since he would immediately see our clinic as ‘one of them.’ At the same time, critiquing fellow health practitioners wouldn’t do any good either. Instead, we started to get his attention by agreeing about critiquing the medical system in general and the way it operates. Such a critique is acceptable because it is faceless.

We told him about a couple of negative experiences with insurance medicine from our clinic, and as soon as his attention was switched from particular health practitioners, whom he blamed for worsening his symptoms, to the general topic, he became very engaged. It became apparent that now we had a chance to get through. 

Next, we offered him the following deal: No money will be paid for therapy until he starts to see the first signs of improvement. In return, he must dedicate all his free time to homework between sessions and be patient. The plan immediately impressed him, and he agreed.

 

Results:

The patient started to notice improvements after six sessions. Starting from the 7th session, while he continued to improve, he began to reimburse our services. At the end of the treatment, when shoulder functions were restored, he insisted and paid us for the first 6 sessions as well.

 

2. REGRESSION

Regression is a protective reaction of the brain when the patient starts to behave and act like a child, by doing that, the patients ease their stress level by trying to trigger sympathy from people around them.  

A 46-year-old woman works as a registered nurse. She suffers from long-lasting chronic headaches and neck pain. She also developed severe anxiety, which got worse with each flare-up of a headache. Her anxiety was so bad that it triggered various visceral abnormalities: palpitation, increased respiratory rate (tachypnea), nausea with vomiting, etc. Recently, she was in the ER monthly and sometimes two times per month. 

From the beginning, the most striking observation about her was how she acted when describing her symptoms. It was bizarre to see a middle-aged woman talking with a childish voice, playing with her hair, etc. She frequently used a third voice to describe the history of her symptoms. For example, she would say with a child-like voice, “Jane was a bad girl and did not take her migraine medications.”

 

Addressing The Psychological Component Of Somatic Pain Syndrome

Regression is the easiest protective brain reaction to overcome since the patient is already looking for people who are willing to take care of them. From this perspective, it was an easy case to handle. After the clinical evaluation, we gave her a piece of paper and a pen and dictated everything she had to do at home. Initially, she wanted to type it on her iPhone, but we insisted on handwriting. This way, we could trigger her dedication by re-creating her younger years in a school setting. Thus, she needed to write it down by herself. Every session, we started with her detailed reporting of how she felt and what she did at home to help her with her headache and neck pain. Same as the teacher asks the student about doing homework with a teacher’s attitude and voice.

 

Results:

After the headache and cervical pain were completely under control, the regressive behavior disappeared. She acted as any other 46-year-old woman should, fully engaged in her work as a registered nurse.

Her husband’s remarks were the most interesting reaction. Of course, he was happy that his wife was out of chronic pain, but the most important outcome of the therapy he phrased as, “I’ve got my wife back!” 

 

3. HYPOCHONDRIAC

Technically speaking, Hypochondriasis is an independent and very debilitating disease. Those patients develop an inaccurate perception of various diseases formed in their body, mind, or both, despite the absence of an actual medical problem. Therapists and much more qualified health practitioners usually fail to help these patients. Usually, Hypochondriasis is present for years without any light at the end of the tunnel. 

However, some patients with chronic pain may exhibit the hypochondriac type of behavior, which started after they developed the initial symptoms. In these cases, it is another form of self-defense that the brain employs to deal with chronic pain. 

The difference between real hypochondriacs and those patients who exhibit hypochondriac-type behavior is that the second group is looking for help, while real hypochondriacs visit any health office as a way of life. The simple distinction is the absolute absence of even minimal improvement for the real hypochondriac and the lack of any cooperation for homework. At the same time, patients with hypochondriac type behavior will notice it and inform their therapists about any clinical improvements.

 

A 32-year-old very intelligent woman came to our clinic with complaints about a severe migraine-type headache she developed in the last 2 years. She is a computer programmer and was forced to quit a year ago due to intense headaches that flare up after hours of computer work. 

First, she pulled a two-inch-thick file of her medical records and prints from WebMD. The conversation with her looks like an endless chain of theories she developed based on Internet research about why she has a headache and why nothing helps her. 

Clinical evaluation showed that she is 100% our type of patient, and we will be able to decisively help her since she exhibited all the signs and symptoms of Greater Occipital Nerve Neuralgia. However, if we say to her, “Don’t worry, we will take care of your headache in 4-5 sessions” (which was true), there was a good chance that she would never come back to our clinic, thinking that we were practicing quack medicine.

Her mind was already made up that something more serious and dangerous had happened to her, and no one simply was able to figure it out yet. One of her ideas was that she had a constant headache because of her childhood cardiac problem. Her foramen ovale (opening between both atria) triggered her headache. Yes, it is a medical fact that a not fully closed foramen ovale may later in life manifest itself as a migraine-type headache; however, in her case, the opening was completely closed in her early years.

 

Addressing The Psychological Component Of Somatic Pain Syndrome

Simply dismissing the patient’s theories, including ‘cardiac theory,’ was completely counterproductive since it was exactly what other health practitioners, including her PCP, did. Instead, after the clinical evaluation, we asked her to leave her file and let us go over it in detail later, and we rescheduled her evaluation appointment with no charge. The suggestion surprised her since no one even attempted to look into her carefully arranged file of Internet prints. A quick examination of the papers in the file showed that all the data she collected had nothing to do with her problems. 

At the beginning of the next session, we expressed deep gratitude for the file she brought in and acknowledged that her headache was a very serious puzzle. We suggested she try some tools Medical Massage offers, and we emphasized that since her problem is very complicated, we expected that just reducing the intensity of her symptoms. In reality, we expected complete elimination of her headache. She enthusiastically agreed since even the possibility of partial relief of her headache’s intensity was great news.

We insisted that to better help her, we needed her active engagement with homework, which she needed to do between sessions. We also emphasized that we needed her to start a little diary to write how she felt after each session and between sessions. It was obvious that the patient was excited about this offer.

When she came back after the first session, it was obvious that something positive had happened. The next day, she had a very intense flare-up of her headache that continued the day after (we informed her about such a possibility at the end of the first session), but the morning of the second session, she noticed some improvements. It was exactly what we expected.

At this point, she pulled out her notebook where she wrote in detail all her symptoms hourly, starting with the hour after the first session! There were pages of meticulously taken notes! I took time to read all of them, even though they didn’t make any difference in the treatment plan. It was evident that the patient watched as I turned page after page until the end. As soon as I finished, I told the patient that these notes were an exceptional help since they had guided me in formulating a better treatment plan. 

 

Results:

As I planned, her headache was under complete control after approximately six sessions of MEDICAL MASSAGE PROTOCOL for Chronic Headache. She stayed in supportive monthly sessions for four months before we completely discharged her from the clinic.

After one of the monthly sessions, she said that she had a personal question to ask. I answered, “Of course!” Her question was, “You knew everything from the very beginning, and you didn’t need all my notes, did you?” I answered, “Your notes made a huge contribution to the therapy, and we never would have succeeded without them.” She has been completely headache-free for more than a year.

 

4. FEAR

Fear is a very difficult-to-overcome brain defense mechanism. The main nature of it is fear of more pain, which therapy MAY trigger. It is especially common if patients have already experienced treatment that was painful or was unsuccessful and generated more pain and dysfunction after. Unfortunately, it is very common since some therapists were misled by educational sources and tried to help patients by overriding the patient’s pain threshold.

A fifty-year-old patient came to our clinic under pressure from her girlfriend, whom we had helped before. Witnessing her miserable state, her girlfriend convinced her and drove her to the clinic. The patient wanted her to be present in the therapy room.

The patient is in visible distress, and her main complaint is severe neck pain, which triggered very severe peripheral neuropathy within the radial and median nerve distribution. She was in therapy for several months with a massage therapist, a chiropractor, an acupuncturist, and a physical therapist. Currently, she only uses medications and acupuncture since this combination helps her to control pain intensity without stability of clinical results. All other treatments significantly worsen her symptoms, and it takes her weeks to recover.

The patient’s first question was whether our therapy would hurt her, and even asking that made her emotional. During evaluation, even a light touch triggered fear in her, and she held her girlfriend’s hand. Thus, fear developed by her brain as a defense mechanism was the first enemy, and its elimination became the first critical step in the therapy.

Addressing The Psychological Component Of Somatic Pain Syndrome

The only solution in this situation was:

  1. We inform her that SHE will be in complete control of the treatment, and it will be done only within her comfort level
  2. Before we started the first therapy session, we divided it into three segments, numbered them, and briefly demonstrated our techniques.
  3. We insisted that she come with her girlfriend or a family member at least at the beginning of the therapy.

During the initial 15-20-minute sessions, we use only drainage strokes, an inhibitory regime of massage therapy, and gentle passive stretching. Before initiating each treatment segment of the therapy, we clearly announced it. For example: ‘I am starting segment #2’.  

Results:

There is no way that this very basic treatment will help with the intensity of symptoms. Still, three sessions with a two-day break made the first breakthrough – we removed fear from her mind, allowing us to use the full application of the Medical Massage protocol afterward. Considering the intensity of her symptoms, it took us nine sessions to eliminate cervical dysfunction and peripheral neurologic symptoms.

In Part II, we will discuss clinical cases of remaining protective mechanisms developed by the brain due to chronic pain – denial, displacement, rationalization and emotional instability.

 


Category: Medical Massage

Tags: